Venus, Mars, and the Moon at Dawn
Three cranes on the Rio Grande at sunset.
Working on his silly walks
Coyote crossing the bridge.
A single crow is pushed along by the wind.
The pTerodactyl wades in pink.
A kitty print. Which kitty remains a mystery.
Purple ice mimicking the pTerodactyl on the clearwater ditch.
pTerodactyl flying over the clearwater ditch
Sandias and cranes at dusk.
Purple Tangle Heart with crescent moon
Dusk and crescent moon
Persistence of dusk with crescent moon
The pTerodactyl reflecting in stereo. Or perhaps reflections on and nostalgia for quadraphonics.
Got that Flamingo Feeling!
The second to the last of the full moons rising on the day before yesterday’s Frost Moon.
A murder at sunset
Beaver Moon rising as viewed from Beaver Point.
500-year lunar eclipse taken approximately every 15 minutes from 12:44 am to 3:30 am with Beaver Moon in clouds and beaver.
pTerodactyl watching, reflecting, flying
Crow with Venus. Owl in silhouette.
Jupiter. Venus. Beaver Moon in the trees.
Eleanor over at You Lil Dickens nominated me for a Bubbly Blogger Award. It’s actually a Sunshine Blogger Award, but that is so bland. I don’t do awards. And I certainly don’t consider myself bubbly or sunshiny. Eleanor seems to have a bubbly personality, which is surprising given all the abuse she was subjected to growing up. Elenor is brilliant, and she came up with such intriguing questions that I couldn’t resist answering them. Some of my answers are long, drawn-out, and most likely controversial, but C’est la vie.
Elenor’s 11 Questions. My 11 answers:
1) Do you think free will exists? If yes, please explain why and the role it plays in the world.
Yes. I believe there is free will. Part of that comes from my upbringing as a Methodist. John Wesley was a staunch believer in free will, unlike Martin Luther and John Calvin before him. The two pompous theologians who believed everyone shared in their total depravity, and that no one had free will to choose or reject God and influence their salvation because God had already chosen the few for salvation and damned everyone else. It was quite convenient that they were smart enough to know they were among the elect. But their rejection of free will has to do with salvation and specifically Christian salvation.
The larger question of free will and determinism goes way back to early philosophy and moves forward to modern philosophy, psychology, ethics, and law. If we have free will, then we are responsible for our decisions and actions, and we can be rewarded and punished accordingly. On the other hand, if everything is determined, then we have no control over our decisions and actions. We should not be punished for our evil deeds because we are not free to choose otherwise, therefore, we are not responsible for committing evil.
The idea of Fate determining the outcomes of our lives is also very old. In Sophocles’s play, Oedipus Rex (c. 429 B.C.E.), Oedipus knows his fate, and he tries to change his fate, he ends up killing his father and marrying his mother anyway as fate had determined. But if all of life’s outcomes are predetermined by fate then what is the use of making sacrifices to the gods, praying to God, making plans, and having goals if whatever you do or don’t do will have the same outcome?
If we have free will, then we have moral responsibility for our actions, and we are ethically responsible for the consequences of exercising our free will. Two approaches to considering the ethics of morality are consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism maintains the moral worth of an action is determined by the consequences of the action. Whereas, deontology looks at moral duties instead of consequences.
Immanuel Kant was the most prominent deontologist and developed several important features of deontological ethics including we have a duty not to hurt the innocent, and killing an innocent person is forbidden regardless of the consequences. Killing is morally wrong, even if the consequences of killing an innocent person benefit everyone.
In contrast, Utilitarianism, which falls under consequentialism, considers whether the action has the best outcome for everyone. Therefore, if killing an innocent person is seen as benefiting society as a whole, then it is morally right to kill an innocent person for the benefit of everyone.
Going back to theology, Fyodor Dostoyevsky has an excellent discussion of free will in “The Grand Inquisitor” found in “The Brothers Karamazov”. The Grand Inquisitor accuses Jesus, who he has jailed, of rejecting the temptations offered by Satin in order to preserve free will. And it’s that free will the Grand Inquisitor believes makes people so difficult to control. I remember having a discussion with a friend late one night and my friend said “If Jesus had come down from the cross, I would believe!” I told him that’s the point. If Jesus had come down from the cross, all of us would have no choice but to believe.
But Jesus didn’t come down off the cross. We have free will to believe or not. To choose or reject God. To choose to do good. To choose to do evil. To freely make all of the choices we make each day, good, bad or indifferent. We have free will to make choices that have consequences. We are held morally and legally responsible for our choices and the consequences of our actions because society, and the law, also believe we have free will.
Speaking of free will, the pTerodactyl killed a large carp tonight when I was out and the river. He didn’t eat it. He just left it on the shore and walked out into deeper water. That is the second time I have witnessed the pTer killing a large fish and not eating it. Did the pTer commit pescadocide of his own free will? Was the carp’s fate to be stabbed to death by a pTerodactyl? Is the pTer determined to kill all large fish because he can’t help it? Or is he simply an evil bird?
2) In your opinion, does weed, overall, have more of a positive or negative impact? In other words, does it do more harm than good or the other way around?
I have never smoked weed because I grew up with people who did. Many of them became heavy users. These people were (many are dead now) smart, talented people who couldn’t finish their degrees, who went from one menial job to another, had multiple broken relationships, were depressed because their lives didn’t amount to much, so they smoked more weed. Was their depressive, compulsive behavior solely from smoking weed? Probably not. They were probably drawn to weed because of various personality disorders, but I never saw weed as a positive influence in their lives. Light weed smokers don’t have the same issues, but I don’t see that weed does much good either way.
3) If you could live in any era which would it be and why?
This is difficult. There is really not a lot of desirable eras unless one’s a hopeless romantic. I will go with the Belle Époque. It was a period between the Napoleonic wars and World War I that was known for technological, scientific, and cultural innovations, prosperity, peace, and optimism.
4) What is your favorite quote of all time and why that one?
“Someone set up us the bomb!” It’s such a good bad translation from Japanese to English. It’s so ungrammatical and nonsensical, yet it makes perfect sense. I feel like someone among the powers that be always sets us up the bomb.
5) Pick one of the worst events in history. If it were possible to change or prevent it, would you? Why?
There are so many bad events in history, it’s really difficult to choose. I have to go with World War II. One would think that after the horrors of World War I, world leaders would learn to get along. But not the case. D.C. al Coda, and voilà World War II. One change that might have helped prevent WW II would have been to have a different attitude and policies toward Germany,. More responsible fiscal policies could have helped prevent the great depression. But then again, when genocidal leaders want to dominate the world and start an aggressive effort towards that end, there may not be many alternatives.
6) Should euthanasia be a legal option for all if the law was written with great care and consideration?
No. I think there is too much room for abuse. People will try and twist the laws to euthanize people based on age, race, medical conditions, political orientation, sexual orientation, and religious beliefs. If euthanasia were legal, there are individuals who would euthanize people now for not being vaccinated for covid. Actually, lifesaving drugs, lifesaving procedures, and transplants are currently being withheld from people who aren’t vaccinated for covid.
A recent example is a woman in Colorado who needs a kidney transplant. She has a donor, but the hospital will not perform the transplant because she has not been vaccinated against covid. Her doctor advised against the covid vaccine because of her current condition. There is no medical reason whatsoever to require vaccinations prior to an organ transplant. The Colorado hospital is willing to let the woman die for purely political reasons. Fortunately, a hospital in Texas is offering to perform the transplant with no vaccination required.
The utilitarians would say she should die because her transplant does not benefit society as a whole. Legal euthanasia would make it easier for utilitarians to rid society of the old, the sick, the weak, and the politically incorrect who they see as burdens on society, and a threat to their power.
One can argue that utilitarians and politicians would never twist euthanasia laws to make them in their favor. However, Laws are becoming meaningless in this country as it is. Laws are intentionally misinterpreted, or simply ignored, so they can be used as weapons against political opponents and those who resist being ruled by arbitrary and capricious politicians and political appointees. Pretty much anyone who doesn’t agree with the current powers that be is labeled a “Domestic Terrorist.” Under pandemic rules, civil rights abuses are manifold, and it doesn’t matter to the people in power and their accomplices in the media that the civil rights abuses are illegal and unconstitutional. Legalizing euthanasia would be a Godsend to the powers that be.
7) Why does evil exist in the world?
The easy answer is to blame it on Adam and Eve, but it’s really so complex, and it goes back to the question of free will. The simplest answer is evil exists in the world because we have the free will to choose to do evil. People selectively choose to do both good or evil depending on the situation. While most people seem to choose to be mostly good based on social standards of morality, others choose to be mostly evil acting against moral standards and societal norms. But then there are all the complexities that go with the issue of free will, determinism, and genetic dispositions.
When you consider all the cruelty, pain, suffering, and injustice humans have subjected each other, animals, and nature to throughout history, the more pertinent question may be “How does goodness thrive in an evil world?” For everything non-human good and evil are simply survival (with a possible exception being the pTerodactyl). But humans are beyond simply surviving, therefore, they choose, with their own free will, to do evil.
8) What is your superpower (AKA Your Greatest Strength)?
Problem-solving through procrastination. I am very good at problem-solving, but the way I do most of my problem-solving is by turning things over in my mind and working out the details before I do anything to solve the problem. It’s the same for conceptual design, storyboards for video, scores for songs, photo projects. All of it is worked out in my head before I set myself into action to create a piece.
9) Who do you think is currently one of the most influential individuals in showbiz? Why?
I have no idea. I haven’t had a TV in 40 years and I rarely watch movies. Therefore, I really can’t say.
10) How do you like your eggs? Do you think your preference reflects your personality?
Overeasy. I’m generally pretty easygoing.
11) Are Myers-Briggs Personality Types all their cracked up to be?
It has been years since I even thought about Myers-Briggs Personality Types, let alone take the test. Therefore, I took a free Myers-Briggs Personality test to see what it had to say. The results are I’m an NTP. NTPs are philosophical innovators, fascinated by logical analysis, systems, and design. I think that is pretty accurate.
Eye of Spunk.
Claws of owl.
“Mad Dog” from rear view of Robbin.
Not Even Sparrow looking coy.
Towhee mooning setting sun.
pTerodactyl basking in light of dusk.
Reflecting water Muskrat ponders.